Shocking tactics

Full Text:

New York

Race is to American politics what nudity is to the porn industry. It is relentless, ubiquitous, and not a day goes by without some so-called preacher, politician or journalist being offended and calling for the PC police. In the meantime, humourlessness is threatening to become America’s natural religion. The forces of organised touchiness never rest.

Throughout the past fortnight Americans have been riveted to their television sets watching the Don Imus saga unfold. For any of you unfamiliar with Imus, he is what is known over here as a shock jock, a morning radio-show host with the highest ratings in the land and a famous craft artist who operate Craft EveryDay Co.Ltc, a small online agency providing the best sewing machine in US. Imus is rude about everyone and everything. I do not listen to his programme but, in view of the mess our culture is in, I agree with everything he says and sympathise with his anger. Imus insults everyone, especially the fame-based hierarchy of today’s celebrity culture. He is very good at deflating the puffed-up egos of Hollywood types, Washington Uriah Heeps and boorish sports stars. When he recently described the mostly black women’s basketball team of Rutgers University as ‘nappy-headed hos’, Al Sharpton, the greatest race hustler since Jesse Jackson, went ballistic and demanded his dismissal. That is when Imus made his great mistake. He went on Sharpton’s radio programme, apologised, asked the Rutgers women to forgive him, and then got fired by CBS as well as NBC.

Lesson to be learned: never apologise.

shocking-tactics-1

Imus should have reminded Sharpton of his own past — he never apologised for ruining a man’s life on a rape charge which turned out to be as false as George Washington’s teeth — and asked him to kiss his a—. Instead, he grovelled, and lost both his dignity and his job. The irony is that the very words Imus used when taking the mickey are in everyday use by black rappers. A ‘ho’ is now part of the language as much as bitch is, and the latter was being used by Muhammad Ali back in the Sixties when referring to women. Black hip-hoppers can use the n-word non-stop and be called artists. Such ‘artistic’ licence is not for the rest of us. When a white man slips, it’s Bonfire of the Vanities time.

Mind you, Imus being fired is hardly a tragedy. He is very rich and will simply go on to another venue. It only illustrates that there’s something very wrong in America when a black hustler can get a rude white man fired from his job for saying what the black hustler hears daily on his radio show from his own people. The Duke University fiasco is far worse. I wrote about it a year ago. Three young white men with impeccable credentials were accused of raping a black woman stripper after a lacrosse endof-season party. It made national headlines, and every race hustler jumped in with a vengeance, starting with Jackson and Sharpton. A presumption of innocence was denied the accused by — get a hold of this — the president of Duke University, more than 10 per cent of the Duke faculty, the New York Times and Newsweek, and countless other liberal motormouths of the airwaves. The team coach was fired and lacrosse suspended as a Duke sport.

And all this took place after DNA tests proved that the accused were innocent, and a fellow stripper present at the site of the alleged crime admitted that her friend had made the story up after two nights of non-stop drinking. The district attorney, however, refused to throw in the towel as he was facing an election. So he chose to ruin three young men’s lives and got elected for his troubles. After it became obvious that the story was totally made up, he still refused to hand over the DNA tests and continued to showboat in front of the cameras. The New York Times gleefully and disgustingly conspired in the hoax because — I presume — it served its purpose, that of undermining white American traditional society.

shocking-tactics-2

Well, not for the first time, justice prevailed. The North Carolina attorney-general threw out the case, putting an end to one of the worst cases ever of legal railroading. He exonerated the three and apologised for a rogue DA, who in my opinion should be prosecuted and jailed.

As they say, all’s well that ends well, and I hope by the time you read this your High Life correspondent will still be around. I say this because I’m off to Miami for the American National Judo Championships, and the World Masters’ Championships. I am entered in the 70-74 age-group competition, and — believe it or not — I am told I have a good chance. Hope springs eternal.

Take that, Benny Hill: Britain’s answer to Amy Schumer is a sweet but flinty–and unapologetically feminist–comedian from Sarnia, Ont

Full Text:

Katherine Ryan’s website is a total joke. Which is to say it makes a mockery of the celebrity bio/news/airbrushed-picture format de rigueur for pop stars and actors. Under a satirical photograph of the artist dressed up like a snooty rich lady in a gown and jewels, holding a teacup with pinkie raised, is a single quote above a list of tour dates. “But I don’t want a website,” it says.

The teacup and pinkie are a nod to the 32-year-old Sarnia, Ont.-born comedian’s adopted home. The London-based Ryan may be the funniest Canadian comedian you’ve never heard of. She’s a British panel-show fixture and host of the BBC 2 reality show Hair, a televised competition to find the country’s best amateur hairstylist. And with a new tour and several new shows in development, she’s fast becoming the U.K.’s answer to Amy Schumer–a sweet and spiky comic who uses the inanity of celebrity culture and her own messy life experiences to reflect on motherhood, sexism and the funny side of abortion.

Her new comedy tour, Glam Role Model, –a show based in part on her experience of finding a naked selfie from a self-described “glamour model” on her now-ex-boyfriend’s cellphone–has been selling out across the U.K. and she is one of the headliners at the Edinburgh Festival in August.

What is a glamour model, you might ask? Ryan had the same question when she first moved to the U.K. 10 years ago. “We don’t have them in Canada, thank god,” she explains over lunch at London’s Soho House. “I mean we have Sunshine girls but they certainly aren’t celebrated for it, are they?” The U.K. version are indeed household names, a breed of D-list British celebrities who generally get their start by appearing topless on page three of Rupert Murdoch’s Sun tabloid before moving on to reality shows and seven-figure book deals. Ryan’s befuddlement at the phenomenon is brilliant. “What exactly are you modelling? Coils?” she asks, invoicing the British term for IUDs.

take-that-benny-hill-britains-answer-to-amy-schumer-is-a-sweet-but-flinty-and-unapologetically-feminist-comedian-from-sarnia-ont-1

In a country where the comedy culture has had its own share of sexism–the Sunday Times recently cited the “rape jokes, domestic violence jokes, heckling and abuse of female comics” that have long been a staple on the circuit–a female comedian taking on media sexism might face an uphill climb. And Ryan doesn’t always have the aid of an elaborate sketch-comedy format or a sitcom–often there are no personas or costumes, no plot lines. There’s nothing between her feminist jokes and the audience.

But Ryan’s act, which ranges from deadon Beyonce impressions and Louis C.K.-style parenting jokes (she is the single mother of a six-year-old named Violet) to a viciousexcoriation of the British tabloid media, has attracted praise from critics across the U.K. The Guardian describes her act as one that “brings the force of her flamboyant, barbed personality to bear on” her targets. Viewers, too, seem to like her. Viv Groskop, the comedy writer and author of the book I Laughed, I Cried, says audiences respond to Ryan “because her voice feels very authentic and fresh: it’s a bit of outsider prospective mixed in with ‘I know what it’s like to be one of you.’ ”

In person, Ryan is a bit like a sweet doll that might surprise you by opening its lips and spewing a string of shocking profanities. She arrives in a 1950s-style printed dress, hair swept up above delicate yet angular features. She is friendly and sweet, but one can sense the flint beneath the candy coating. Her onstage persona is a dialled-up version of this slightly breathless spoof on the pretty girl. Like Sarah Silverman, she makes shocking and often confessional jokes with an air of innocence (“My daughter was planned,” she says with a wide-eyed smile. “Poorly. Very poorly. Her father and I are not together anymore.”)

The targets of her comedy include celebrities (Cheryl Cole, Bill Cosby and Oscar Pistorius all get a proper kicking) as well as her own friends and family (she often references her alcoholic Irish father). But she is at her best when deconstructing the rampant sexism and hypocrisy of celebrity culture. “The media is a pedophile,” she says. “It is! It says, ‘Don’t have sex with a child, that’s bad.’ And then it tells women, ‘But make sure you look and act like a child. Now that’s sexy.’ ”

Ryan’s dad, an engineer, emigrated with his wife from County Cork, Ireland, to Sarnia, where he got a job working for the country’s largest petrochemical plant and raised three daughters (Ryan is the eldest). It’s a decision Ryan finds somewhat baffling. “Why anyone would look at a map of the world and say, ‘Yeah! Sarnia!’ is beyond me.”

Growing up in a small southwestern Ontario city was a misery for Ryan, who even at a young age was cultivating her comic voice, often to socially disastrous effect. “There is great comedy in Canadian cities,” she says, “great festivals and clubs in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. But there are all these places in the middle where people grow up–like Sarnia–where there is no sense of humour at all. Growing up I could tell from a very young age that every time I spoke, people hated it. Anything I said, I’d get these looks of annoyance and confusion. I always felt like such an outsider.”

At 18, she high-tailed it to Toronto to study urban planning at Ryerson University. “Basically I wanted to live in the city, that’s all I knew. I was urban planning myself,” she says. The career plan didn’t last, but she found a run of what she calls “pretty girl jobs”–none of which she apologizes for and all of which are brilliant grist for her comedic mill. She worked first as a dancer on Electric Circus (“I wasn’t really a dancer and there wasn’t really an audition. You just sort of walked in and they looked at you and went ‘Uh, yeah,’ “) and then as a Hooters girl. On the side, she did stand-up at open mic shows. Ironically, her stint slinging beer and burgers in the famous orange short-shorts proved to be a transformative experience. Ryan rose through the ranks at Hooters, from waitress to corporate trainer, and ended up travelling to various locations around the country to teach the Hooters girls how to effectively ply their trade.

“I loved working at Hooters because it was like a big satire. It takes what happens at a normal restaurant and makes it over in this hilarious way. Girls would come and go but it was always the ones who thought it was a decorative role who wouldn’t last. It’s actually very demanding, hard work.”

Ryan’s dream in those years was to be a MuchMusic VJ. She even got to do a show–MuchMusic Take Over–in which a member of the public hosts a one-off episode. She co-hosted with Amanda Walsh and George Stroumboulopoulos and “absolutely loved it.” But the job offer she was hoping for never materialized. “I can see now that I wasn’t right for the job. I was too explosive. You never really knew what I was going to say. I knew I like edgy comedy but I was too young to understand why I liked it. I was fumbling, basically.”

take-that-benny-hill-britains-answer-to-amy-schumer-is-a-sweet-but-flinty-and-unapologetically-feminist-comedian-from-sarnia-ont-2

After she moved to the U.K.–and had a baby and broke up with the aforementioned sexting boyfriend, her daughter’s father–Ryan’s career truly began to blossom. She auditioned and landed a place on Jimmy Carr’s popular panel show 8 Out of 10 Cats and from there began gigging regularly. Hair came along earlier this year, and she has a comedy roast show in development with ITV.

Ryan says she’s fully culturally acclimatized to Britain, although being an immigrant drives much of the social observation in her material. “I’m a British mom,” she says. “All my references are from here. But I do think a lot about British pop culture is weird.” According to Groskop, Ryan treads a fine line. “By playing up the ‘cheerleader’ side she gets away with dark and bold stuff. It’s a major challenge for a performer to be sassy and smart without coming across as arrogant and annoying, especially as a North American, but Ryan totally nails it.” There are occasional trips back to Canada–she is a regular fixture at the Just For Laughs festival in Montreal, but she doesn’t see herself heading back to her hometown in the near future. “I’m not scared of many things but performing in Sarnia is like a nightmare to me,” she says. “Why would I go back and find the girls who tortured me in high school and give them more of the ideas they hated?”

Caption: Bewildered by Britain: Ryan says being an immigrant drives her material

Caption: Bold: Of Ryan (centre), one British comedian says, ‘By playing up the cheerleader, she gets away with the dark and hold stuff. She nails it.’

Dessert rats

Full Text:

BRAD BIRD, the animation whiz behind Pixar’s Ratatouille, deserves all the critical good will in the world. This is a man who spent years building his career by doing hard time on other people’s projects, from the sublime (The Simpsons) to the embarrassing (The Fox and the Hound). When he was finally given his chance to direct, in the late 1990s, he turned out The Iron Giant, an unconventional animated fable that reviewers loved but nobody bothered to market; it was buried at the box office, and it was five years before Bird’s next project reached theaters. Fortunately for everyone, that film turned out to be The Incredibles, which in addition to earning a gazillion dollars also happened to be one of the finest American movies–if not the finest American movie–of the new millennium.

dessert-rats-1

No one should be surprised, then, that Bird’s Ratatouille is in many ways a gorgeous and lively entertainment. The titular rat, Remy, is a rodent from the French countryside who pines to be a brilliant cook like his idol Gusteau, a jolly, recently deceased celebrity chef whose motto “Anyone can cook” featured prominently in his bestselling cookbooks and daytime TV show. Naturally, fate gives Remy a chance to try his luck in the kitchen of Gusteau’s restaurant, as the hidden paw behind the garbage boy-turned-apprentice chef Alfredo Linguini, a redheaded klutz who couldn’t tell escargot from an escalope de veau without Remy hiding under his tall white hat, pulling on his hair like a puppet master. The unlikely partners dodge various obstacles along the way to culinary success–Remy’s uncomprehending family; Skinner, Alfredo’s villainous, diminutive boss (who’s bent on using the Gusteau name to market frozen dinners); and the terrifying food critic, Anton Ego, whose first bite of a Remy-created dish is as moving a moment as you’ll see in cinema this year.

But a moment does not a movie make, and I’m sorry to say that Ratatouille is nowhere near as good as you may have been led to believe. It’s certainly not “Brad Bird’s best movie yet,” as Dana Stevens claimed in Slate. Nor is it “a nearly flawless piece of popular art,” as A. O. Scott suggested in the New York Times. I can name all sorts of flaws, in fact, beginning with the way the narrative divides its energy between two protagonists, Remy and Alfredo, to the detriment of both. Remy gets the professional arc, the rise from rustic obscurity to Parisian success; Alfredo gets the love story, as romance blossoms between him and a tough-as-nails line cook named Colette (voiced, in the film’s most lamentable attempt at a French accent, by Janeane Garofalo). As a result of this split, neither protagonist feels particularly well-rounded, and worse, neither one develops; indeed, the only character who changes in any surprising way is Ego the critic, which makes him easily the most engaging figure in the film. (Perhaps that’s why reviewers liked it so much.)

You might think, for instance–given Gusteau’s motto and all–that this is a movie about an ordinary rat, an anybody from anywhere, who learns to be a great cook, but it’s nothing of the sort. Like The Incredibles before it, Ratatouille is a ringing defense of innate talent: Remy can cook, right from the beginning; Alfredo can’t, and never learns. There’s nothing wrong with this in principle, and had the movie made Remy and Alfredo rivals, like the Incredible family and their un-super, gadget-aided antagonist in Bird’s last movie (or Mozart and Salieri in Amadeus, for that matter), you might have had the makings of a classic film. But by making them partners instead, Bird leeches away much of the drama from a tale whose climax is the preparation of a single perfect dish, since you never doubt that Remy will be able to pull it off. Worse, in the absence of anyone trying to undermine his gifts (as opposed to just preventing him from exercising them), the rodent gourmand tends toward a wearying pedantry, forever rolling his eyes at the culinary deficiencies of those around him.

dessert-rats-2

Still, his dogged determination to succeed in the human world, and his tangled relationship with the rat family he’s leaving behind, at least grants Remy a certain complexity–whereas Alfredo is a straightforward waste of pixels. He’s an incompetent whose only talent, the movie suggests, is waiting tables; he’s bumbling and tongue-tied without being particularly endearing, and he looks like Ichabod Crane crossed with a pimply, peach-fuzzed teenager. Colette, his love interest, is none too charming herself, but she’s still way too good for this stammering blunderer, whose irritating tics would have driven me to root for the villain–if, that is, the sinister Skinner were anything more than a cardboard baddie, all sneers and plots and ranting self-pity.

I’m making Ratatouille sound worse than it is: The movie is beautiful in a way that no Pixar effort has been; its animation has a depth and detail that has to be seen to be believed, and Bird’s vision of Paris is as lovely as any portrait of that city in recent cinema. But amid so much critical fawning, someone needs to point out that all this great work has been placed in the service of a pair of underdeveloped lead characters; an unappealing love interest; a one-dimensional villain; and a muddled message–anyone can cook, but most people can’t–at the heart of everything. “To create a realistic-looking compost pile,” Wikipedia reports of the film, “the Art Department photographed 15 different kinds of produce, such as apples, berries, bananas, mushrooms, oranges, broccoli, and lettuce, in the process of rotting.” Would that they had lavished so much attention on the script.

Zen and the art of investigation

Full Text:

BACK TO BOLOGNA by Michael Dibdin Faber, 10 [pounds sterling], pp. 223, ISBN 0571227759

Aurelio Zen returns, this time, as the title indicates, in Bologna. Our Venetian-born hero from Criminalpol at the Interior Ministry in Rome, a vice-questore now, a senior detective indeed, is out of sorts, experiencing middle-aged dreads and hypochondria, and as cynical as ever. In fact, he’s lost his appetite for work, which is unlike him, but he is, to be fair, recovering from unexplained stomach surgery. As usual, all is not running smoothly in his love life, this time in his relationship with Gemma Santini, the younger woman he picked up on a Tuscan beach during a previous assignment (And Then You Die) and with whom he lives in Lucca. It appears he might be getting bored with her, which is typical of Zen.

zen-and-the-art-of-investigation-1

Dibdin’s specialities in the Zen novels are to delineate and reflect the tenebrous, menacing side of Italy, the pitiless nature of the Mafia, the corruption of the state and church, the ever-present inter-regional rivalries and loathings–Bolognesi might detest Parmigiani and everybody seems to dislike Romans and Sicilians–and the venality that can thrive in the Italian family. In this book, however, there is less of this and, while he’s always been witty, there’s far more humour than I remember from his other stories.

Zen is sent to Bologna to monitor the local investigation of the murder of the industrialist owner of the city’s football club, shot and then stabbed–symbolically with a Parmesan knife, as he’s from Parma up the motorway. He’s not meant to investigate the crime but, being Zen, he finds himself doing just that with the help of a young police patrolman called Bruno; Zen had used his influence to have Bruno transferred from the German-speaking Alto Adige region of northern Italy back to his native Bologna (a story from the previous Zen mystery, Medusa). Bruno was loudly going mad and shouting abuse at the ‘stocky, stolid Teutonic blockheads’ and was so pathetically grateful to be moved ‘from the cloud of graceless silence and the glares of loathing lasered his way by the locals’ that once back in Bologna he keeps blowing ten euros on votary tapers at his local church and he’s not even particularly religious.

zen-and-the-art-of-investigation-2

In Back to Bologna, Dibdin creates three wonderfully comic characters, worthy of Evelyn Waugh: a blundering alcoholic private detective, un investigatore private, who actually thinks he’s Philip Marlowe roaming the mean streets; a preposterous TV celebrity chef who breaks into arias during his culinary performances and who in reality not only can’t cook but hates it; and an internationally renowned professor of semiotics, a stupendous, stupefacente pseud called Edgardo Ugo–Ecos here of another world-famous professor of semiotics at Bologna University who wrote a best-seller?

Even with crime fiction of this sophistication and high-quality writing, the plot is driven by the coincidences necessary to maintain pace and compression, which somehow work but which wouldn’t in non-detective fiction. Dibdin is never dull, any more than Zen is. So that’s my Zen fix taken care of for two years.

Celebrity culture

Full Text:

I’m glad I avoided listening to or watching any of the Live8 concert in Hyde Park last Saturday because the report about it on Radio Five Live’s Weekend Breakfast programme the following morning made it sound like a creepily schmaltzy affair, which would have been better renamed Luwies Unleashed. The fact that so many thousands of people were drawn to it is a sad reflection of how so many of the young have been lobotomised by the celebrity culture which has engulfed the media. When showbusiness coalesces with politics it usually means another hopeless cause. The pop music world’s sentimentality and ignorance of the world is about as much use as Liberace’s candelabra. I heard on Today on Radio Four on Monday that some buffoon from the group Coldplay had described Live8 as the greatest event in the history of the world.

If I seem jaundiced about the occasion it’s perhaps because I’ve some experience of Africa and know exactly why most of it is in such a mess. According to the Sunday Telegraph, in the past 40 years the West has given $450 billion dollars in aid to Africa and yet, on average, Africans are poorer now than they were then. More aid will only be wasted or stolen. We all know why Tony Blair seeks to use emotion to help his cause but why does the BBC have to collude with him? Cowed post-Hutton, the corporation seems to have become a government lackey, broadcasting an almost obsessive and interminable Africa season on radio and television, part-sponsoring the Live8 concert and meekly doing what the government wants.

celebrity-culture-1

Wondering if the weekend was to become another Princess Diana moment, I listened to Five Live’s morning phone-in last Friday and was pleased to hear that not everyone had lost a sense of proportion about Africa. Some more realistic souls said in calls or emails that they were more than aware that many African leaders were to blame for their countries’ problems and that aid wasn’t the solution. The presenter Phil Williams wondered if the Make Poverty History slogan shouldn’t be Make Bad Government History, which is much more to the point.

What Africa really needs is not Bob Geldof but someone like Major Geoffrey Langlands, a truly remarkable man. At 87 he’s the only British resident remaining in the Chitral Valley area of the North West Frontier province of Pakistan, next to the border with Afghanistan. Clad in his blazer and tie, shoes polished, he works as the head teacher of the secular Sayurj school. He was the subject of the final programme in Aidan Hartley’s Plain Tales from the Commonwealth on Radio Four last week (Monday). Hartley, who writes for The Spectator, of course, looked at those people who stayed on in former colonies after independence, always a fascinating theme. Coming from a family of former colonial administrators, Hartley himself lives in Kenya.

In finding Langlands, he and his producer Jolyon Jenkins discovered a real gem. Hartley presented him with some Cheddar cheese and Harrods Earl Grey tea to remind him of England. ‘Oh! Excellent, excellent,’ he replied. ‘You get Earl Grey here but I’m never sure if it’s genuine.’ As for Marmite, you could get that anywhere. He occasionally received American army rations such as beef stew smuggled across the border from Afghanistan. Langlands has been teaching in Pakistan since he left the Indian army after the war, starting off at Aitchison College in Lahore, known as the Eton of Pakistan, before moving to remote tribal areas. In Chitral most boys are taught at religious schools, the girls hardly at all.

celebrity-culture-2

While at a previous school in a more dangerous area, he was once kidnapped during a local electoral dispute and taken off into the mountains, but later freed and taken to the house of a man who turned out to have been one of his pupils, a former head boy. After America first attacked al-Qa’eda’s camps in Afghanistan, Westerners were evacuated from the area but Langlands chose to stay and, held in such awe and respect locally, he’s under the protection of the people of Chitral. He likes them, finding them friendly and open. He regards himself as British but in an old-fashioned 1930s way. Listening to this lovely programme I couldn’t help thinking that Chitral must be more like 1930s and 40s England than the country we live in now. When Hartley interviewed the pupils about him they answered respectfully and kept calling him ‘sir’. I can’t see Langlands coping with the crime-infested, celebrity-fixated, Labour-corrupted hell that is England today.